<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If you are buying an HDTV don&#8217;t pay ridiculous prices for cables.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://xeai.com/public/archives/56/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://xeai.com/public/archives/56</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:51:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert</title>
		<link>http://xeai.com/public/archives/56/comment-page-1#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 19:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xeai.com/public/2007/11/23/if-you-are-buying-an-hdtv-dont-pay-ridiculous-prices-for-cables/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It’s been scientifically/electrically proven that monster cables are better than normal cables. I know mentally that’s hard to swallow, but it’s the truth.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;What you&#039;re protecting against when you buy super expensive cables is future HD and HDMI specs. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I believe that there may be &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;technical superiority&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; in signal and transmission capabilities across various cable brands.  However, since I (like most consumers) watch television without scoping the signal, I shall never know (nor care) if an expensive cable could squeeze a few extra bits of electricity across the divide.  Videophiles and purists certainly want the best of the best and more power to them!



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It’s been scientifically/electrically proven that monster cables are better than normal cables. I know mentally that’s hard to swallow, but it’s the truth.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>What you&#8217;re protecting against when you buy super expensive cables is future HD and HDMI specs. </p></blockquote>
<p>I believe that there may be <strong><em>technical superiority</em></strong> in signal and transmission capabilities across various cable brands.  However, since I (like most consumers) watch television without scoping the signal, I shall never know (nor care) if an expensive cable could squeeze a few extra bits of electricity across the divide.  Videophiles and purists certainly want the best of the best and more power to them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://xeai.com/public/archives/56/comment-page-1#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 04:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://xeai.com/public/2007/11/23/if-you-are-buying-an-hdtv-dont-pay-ridiculous-prices-for-cables/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s been scientifically/electrically proven that monster cables are better than normal cables.  I know mentally that&#039;s hard to swallow, but it&#039;s the truth.
Now, a 6&#039; apple cable (or generic), let&#039;s say that&#039;s $20, versus the $150 monster cable, over such a short distance the generic cable is still easily in spec at 1080p, when you get to 12&#039;, or 50&#039;, that&#039;s when the monster cable&#039;s quality comes in, the apple cable (or generic) in this case will not be able to pass a 1080p signal, (there are some that do, but most won&#039;t).

What&#039;s very crucial is that the 6&#039; and 12&#039; monster cables will also pass a 1440p signal within spec.  What you&#039;re protecting against when you buy super expensive cables is future HD and HDMI specs.  Additionally, obviously you can get a longer cable run (if you need it) let&#039;s say for a wall or ceiling mount projector.

The average consumer connecting their amplifier or PS3 or 360 to the TV only needs a $20 6&#039; cable, this is absolutely true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been scientifically/electrically proven that monster cables are better than normal cables.  I know mentally that&#8217;s hard to swallow, but it&#8217;s the truth.<br />
Now, a 6&#8242; apple cable (or generic), let&#8217;s say that&#8217;s $20, versus the $150 monster cable, over such a short distance the generic cable is still easily in spec at 1080p, when you get to 12&#8242;, or 50&#8242;, that&#8217;s when the monster cable&#8217;s quality comes in, the apple cable (or generic) in this case will not be able to pass a 1080p signal, (there are some that do, but most won&#8217;t).</p>
<p>What&#8217;s very crucial is that the 6&#8242; and 12&#8242; monster cables will also pass a 1440p signal within spec.  What you&#8217;re protecting against when you buy super expensive cables is future HD and HDMI specs.  Additionally, obviously you can get a longer cable run (if you need it) let&#8217;s say for a wall or ceiling mount projector.</p>
<p>The average consumer connecting their amplifier or PS3 or 360 to the TV only needs a $20 6&#8242; cable, this is absolutely true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

